Synopsis- King Kong lies in a coma for 10 years and needs a blood transfusion to facilitate a heart transplant. When a giant female ape is brought to help revive him, he manages to escape with her.
Director- John Guillermin
Cast- Linda Hamilton, Brain Kerwin, John Ashton
Released- 1986
Attempting to turn the 1976 King Kong remake into a franchise. “King Kong Lives” film capitalizes on the nostalgia associated with the colossal gorilla, it fails to deliver a compelling narrative or engaging characters, resulting in a lackluster viewing experience.
One of the film’s redeeming qualities lies in its ambitious attempt to continue Kong’s story. Picking up where the 1976 remake left off, “King Kong Lives” explores the aftermath of the giant ape’s fall from the World Trade Center. The introduction of Lady Kong, a female counterpart for our beloved primate, adds a new dimension to the tale. Unfortunately, the potential for a fresh and interesting storyline is squandered by a script that leans heavily on clichés and lacks the finesse needed to make the audience invest emotionally.
The special effects, a critical component for any monster movie, leave much to be desired. While the film’s budget constraints are apparent, the dated and often laughable visuals detract from any suspense or tension the filmmakers hope to generate. The decision to use a combination of animatronics and unconvincing miniature sets undermines the film’s ability to transport viewers to the fantastical world of giant apes. In an era where special effects were evolving rapidly, “King Kong Lives” feels like a missed opportunity to elevate the franchise with cutting-edge visuals.
The performances from the cast are mediocre at best. Linda Hamilton, fresh off her success in “The Terminator,” fails to inject life into her character, and her chemistry with Kong lacks the emotional resonance required to make the audience care about their bond. Brian Kerwin, playing the heroic Hank Mitchell, delivers a forgettable performance, further contributing to the film’s lack of compelling characters.
The pacing of the film is uneven, with moments of sluggishness punctuated by sudden bursts of action. The screenplay’s attempts at humor often fall flat, failing to elicit the intended laughs from the audience. This inconsistency in tone undermines any chance the film has at establishing a coherent atmosphere.
Despite its flaws, “King Kong Lives” may find a niche audience among fans of B-movie creature features or those seeking a nostalgic trip back to the 1980s. However, for viewers expecting a worthy successor to the original King Kong, this installment falls short. The film’s lack of innovation, coupled with its underwhelming execution, ultimately relegates “King Kong Lives” to the realm of forgettable monster movie sequels. While it may hold a certain charm for enthusiasts of cult classics, it fails to capture the magic that made the original King Kong a timeless classic.
Roses Have Thoughts 
Leave a comment